The situation
Klarna handled enormous volumes of routine service requests (refunds, returns, payment status) across dozens of markets and languages, and it took a customer an average of 11 minutes to resolve an issue.
What the company did
It built an assistant on top of its own account data and pointed it at the high-volume, well-defined requests. It also pushed generative AI inside the company: OpenAI’s customer story reports 90% of Klarna employees using its tools daily, with communications, marketing and legal at 93%, 88% and 86%.
What happened
In the first month the assistant had 2.3 million conversations, two-thirds of all customer service chats, doing the equivalent work of 700 full-time agents. Customers resolved issues in under 2 minutes instead of 11, satisfaction matched human agents, repeat inquiries fell 25%, and Klarna estimated a $40 million profit improvement for 2024. By the first quarter of 2025 the cost per transaction for customer service had fallen 40% over two years, and by the third quarter of 2025 the company said the agent did the work of more than 853 agents and had saved $60 million.
The correction
In May 2025, CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg that “cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor when organizing this, what you end up having is lower quality,” and that “it’s so critical that you are clear to your customer that there will be always a human if you want.” Klarna began hiring for a flexible customer service workforce alongside the AI. The AI didn’t go away: two-thirds of inquiries were still automated in late 2025.
Why both halves matter
The automation delivered what was promised: speed, cost and scale. The reversal shows what happens when cost is the only number on the dashboard. The independent research points the same way. In a study of 5,179 customer support agents (Brynjolfsson, Li and Raymond, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research), giving agents a generative AI assistant raised productivity 14% on average and 34% for newer, less-skilled workers, while improving customer sentiment and employee retention. The most reliable gains came from AI helping people, not replacing them.
How we apply this at Position One
When we build a customer-facing AI tool, whether a quote tool, a build-and-price configurator or an AI Q&A assistant, we design the handoff to a human first and we measure resolution quality, not just how many conversations the machine absorbed. For internal AI models, we train on your own knowledge and best performers so newer staff work closer to the level of your best, which is where the research says the payoff is.
Sources
- Klarna AI assistant handles two-thirds of customer service chats in its first month (PR Newswire, Feb. 27, 2024)
- Klarna customer story (OpenAI)
- Klarna's AI push slashes customer service costs (CX Dive, May 21, 2025)
- Klarna reinvests in human talent for customer service (CX Dive, May 2025)
- Klarna says AI agent does the work of 853 employees (CX Dive, Nov. 20, 2025)
- Generative AI at Work (NBER Working Paper 31161, 2023; Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2025)
