Position One, strategic marketing and consulting

Field note 07 · AI integrations: service at scale

Klarna automated two-thirds of its service chats, then brought people back

Published by Klarna, February 2024, with later reporting by CX Dive. Not a Position One client.

Field notes are not Position One client work. They are our reading of results other companies published, sourced and linked. The numbers belong to them; the analysis, and how we apply it, is ours.

Business
Klarna, the global payments and shopping company, with 150 million consumers.
Integration
An AI customer service assistant built with OpenAI, announced in February 2024 after its first month live, running in 23 markets around the clock in more than 35 languages.
Reported results, first month
2.3 million conversations; two-thirds of customer service chats; the equivalent work of 700 full-time agents; issues resolved in under 2 minutes instead of 11; a 25% drop in repeat inquiries; an estimated $40 million profit improvement for 2024.
Reported later
Customer service cost per transaction down 40%, from $0.32 in Q1 2023 to $0.19 in Q1 2025. By Q3 2025 the agent was doing the work of more than 853 full-time agents and had saved $60 million. In May 2025 the CEO said cost had been weighted too heavily, quality suffered, and the company would make sure a human is always available.
Reported by
Klarna press release via PR Newswire and OpenAI (Feb. 2024); CX Dive reporting on Klarna’s 2025 results and the CEO’s Bloomberg interview.

The situation

Klarna handled enormous volumes of routine service requests (refunds, returns, payment status) across dozens of markets and languages, and it took a customer an average of 11 minutes to resolve an issue.

What the company did

It built an assistant on top of its own account data and pointed it at the high-volume, well-defined requests. It also pushed generative AI inside the company: OpenAI’s customer story reports 90% of Klarna employees using its tools daily, with communications, marketing and legal at 93%, 88% and 86%.

What happened

In the first month the assistant had 2.3 million conversations, two-thirds of all customer service chats, doing the equivalent work of 700 full-time agents. Customers resolved issues in under 2 minutes instead of 11, satisfaction matched human agents, repeat inquiries fell 25%, and Klarna estimated a $40 million profit improvement for 2024. By the first quarter of 2025 the cost per transaction for customer service had fallen 40% over two years, and by the third quarter of 2025 the company said the agent did the work of more than 853 agents and had saved $60 million.

The correction

In May 2025, CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg that “cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor when organizing this, what you end up having is lower quality,” and that “it’s so critical that you are clear to your customer that there will be always a human if you want.” Klarna began hiring for a flexible customer service workforce alongside the AI. The AI didn’t go away: two-thirds of inquiries were still automated in late 2025.

Why both halves matter

The automation delivered what was promised: speed, cost and scale. The reversal shows what happens when cost is the only number on the dashboard. The independent research points the same way. In a study of 5,179 customer support agents (Brynjolfsson, Li and Raymond, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research), giving agents a generative AI assistant raised productivity 14% on average and 34% for newer, less-skilled workers, while improving customer sentiment and employee retention. The most reliable gains came from AI helping people, not replacing them.

How we apply this at Position One

When we build a customer-facing AI tool, whether a quote tool, a build-and-price configurator or an AI Q&A assistant, we design the handoff to a human first and we measure resolution quality, not just how many conversations the machine absorbed. For internal AI models, we train on your own knowledge and best performers so newer staff work closer to the level of your best, which is where the research says the payoff is.

Sources

Related Position One services

Keep reading

More field notes.

Field note 08 · Consulting: software stack and funnel

Owned content and one CRM: a franchise network’s revenue rose 73%

A 250% increase in content production; a 216% increase in organic leads; a 73% surge in revenue year over year since August 2024; a 59.6% increase in deal volume within one year; a 60% increase in deal closures; an 85% increase in commission payouts to brokers.

Published by HubSpot, in a customer case study

Third-party result

Field note 09 · Competing in the AI age: AI search

Ramp’s AI search visibility rose from 3.2% to 22.2%, and why that matters

Ramp’s AI visibility rose from 3.2% to 22.2%, a gain Profound describes as happening within a month (its chart runs Dec. 1, 2024 to Feb. 15, 2025), with 300+ citations and a move from 19th to 8th among fintech brands. 1840 & Co. went from 0% to 11% visibility in a month, and into the top five for remote-staffing prompts, with one structured post.

Published by Profound, in customer case studies

Third-party result

Field note 10 · Political campaigns: media strategy

Where the political ad dollar goes furthest, by the 2024 numbers

$11.1 billion spent in the 2023 to 2024 cycle; connected TV at $2.3 billion (21%), the second-largest medium, ahead of digital ($1.6 billion) and linear cable ($1.37 billion); Arizona at $511 million, fourth in the nation; 2026 projected at a record $11.6 billion with CTV at $2.7 billion (23%). Cost per thousand impressions, per Tech for Campaigns: broadcast $43.35 and cable $22.10 (primetime upfront benchmarks it cites from Media Dynamics), against $16.47 on Meta and $3.50 on Google across its own 2024 buys. In 2020 House races, roughly 75% of TV spending reached voters outside the district (Priorities USA).

Data from AdImpact, Tech for Campaigns, Priorities USA, The Trade Desk, Basis Technologies and peer-reviewed studies

Third-party result

Talk with Position One

Schedule a discovery call.

Thirty minutes, on video or in person. Tell us about your business or campaign, what you need and when you need it. You leave with a clear next step, a scoped proposal, or a straight answer that we are not the right fit.

  • Your goal, and where you are starting from.
  • Which of our services fit, and which do not.
  • The next step, and what we need from you to scope it.
+1 (720) 339-8144admin@positionone.ai6803 E Main Street, Suite 1120, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251. Clients nationwide. We travel to you, or we work remotely.

Schedule a discovery call

We reply within one business day to set a time.

About you

Step 1 of 3: About you

I am contacting you about a

We use your email only to follow up on this request.